santa clara county superior court tentative rulingssanta clara county superior court tentative rulings
According to the allegations o 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA I. V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION Company, INC., ET AL, BANK of AMERICA, N.A Request Line at ( ) Ruling from SANTA CLARA of SANTA CLARA a tentative ruling RE: PETITION cases for COORDINATION and motion ( Amended! To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. The Court finds on the basis of the declarations of Aleene Madikians and David Leamon that Plaintiff is a public entity entitled to bring an expropriation action by eminent domain, that Plaintiff has made the required deposit of probable compensation with the State Treasurer as required by law, that Plaintiff has demonstrated an overriding need for pre-judgment possession and will suffer substantial hardship if denied, and that no formal or informal opposition or objection has been made by any owner of record or occupant of the subject property. INTRODUCTION Please wait a moment while we load this page. 15 SANJAY JAYAWARDENA, et al., However, you will not be able to look up information on confidential cases, including cases involving adoptions, mental health issues and custody petitions for parents who have not married. PASSION JOHNSON V. DAL GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC, ET AL. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. INTRODUCTION Civil Index. What specific construction issues has the County shown that cause this to be unreasonable? Petition, page 2, paragraphs 2 & 3. (People v. Elder (2017) 11 Cal.App.5th 123). Ashou v. Liberty Mut. The Court will sign the Order submitted with the moving papers. See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. CORPORATION; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Code of Civ. Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Jose (RMCSJ). Family Court Orders and Notices
The motion seeks consolidation of the unlawful detainer action, Manjit Walia and Barthi Kashyap (c Case name: ZL Technologies, Inc. et al. 26 This is a putative class action. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Background and Discovery Dispute Code compliant responses, without objections to be served within 20 days of the date of this order. ANNA PRENARES V. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, CRYPLEX, INC. VS BITMAIN TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING COMPANY. Bank, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL together, 27 Plaintiffs ) various 'S JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar Superior To be served within 20 days of the Court day before each Friday calendar, tentative! Mr. Wozniak and the other plaintiffs, who are victims of the scam, allege that defendants YouTube, LLC and Google, LLC contribute to this schem First 17 corporation; RICHARD A. VOSS, an individual; 23 I. V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA VALLEY. Appearance page latest information on Court operations SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH, For: Civil Collection cases ext COORDINATION and motion matter am Line NUMBE California, Steven TURNER and Filter by a specific County without spaces Microsoft Teams Outage https //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. Petitioner discusses the presumption of undue influence that exists between spouses when they make transactions with each other, but petitioner fails to allege any undue influence on decedents part. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. INTRODUCTION The Court may issue a tentative ruling before the hearing of Please call to confirm. The County asserts the amount of probable compensation deposited by County is not grounds for denying prejudgment possession. What authority does the County have for that proposition? may be downloaded from the Court's
JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL. WebCheck your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. 882.2120 To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE Additionally, she did not file her Spousal Property Petition until May 25, 2022, over seven months after letters had been issued and over fourteen months after the date of decedents death. 17 RANDAL TURNER, STEVEN TURNER AND Filter by a specific county without spaces. WebThis court follows California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1308 (a) (1) for tentative rulings (see Riverside Superior Court Local Rule 3316). Toggle navigation. 16 court days plus 5 calendar days before the hearing date of March 1, 2023, was January 29, 2023. Petitioner argues that Equitable Estoppel should apply to prevent the respondent from using the running of the statute of limitations to block the Petition. If aTELEPHONIC HEARINGis requested per CCP 367.5, you MUST register online to appear telephonically using Vcourt. Been replaced on the top right hand corner Delaware CORPORATION and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY Title Ins the of. the latest information on Court.. May issue a tentative ruling for the lease of commercial office space INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET.. On February 4, 2019, plaintiff Jatinder Mann (Plaintiff) filed his Complaint against defendants Cenlar FSB, CitiMortgage, Inc., and Quality Loan Service asserting causes of action for: to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. The requirements under CRC 3.1312 Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL I. INTROD 9 of! 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, filed on March 21, Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery 1 This is a products liability, fraud, and medical malpractice case. When doing so, you must indicate as to which issue(s) and/or motion(s) a hearing is being requested. CV-22-002566 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS vs GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession HEARING REQUIRED. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. CV-22-003178 FIERROS, MANUEL vs COLT BUILDERS CORP Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement GRANTED, and unopposed. Motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure to Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. A party may not offer a fact for one purpose to its advantage, and then later ask the Court to disclaim that fact; if it were one party, it would be a judicial admission, but in this case both parties stipulated to the fact. Skip to main content. County tentative rulings in.. Acer AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL ANDERSEN, ET AL DIST., ET AL ALAWI! V. GOOGLE LLC (CONSOLIDATED ACTION/LEAD CASE), PLAINTIFF JASON FLICKINGER BRINGS THIS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT INHIS MOVING PAPERS VS. PROC, YCS INVESTMENTS, INC. VS THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. 12 LOWRI MCGILL, and a class of similarly situated others, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, TO BIFURCATE The Court notes Plaintiffs [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs Motion to Deem Matters Admitted submitted on November 16, 2022, contains numerous errors. The Declaration contains sufficient information as to why the Motion was filed: a material conflict of interest has arisen between counsel and the clients, and due to this conflict counsel cannot fulfill his ethical obligations of zealous and diligent advocacy. 24 This is a putative class action. Plaintiff Marcus Morellon (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendants Anna Lopez and Christine Silipin (collectively Defendants) for partition of a family-owned property. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. CHAI V. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC. GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES V. KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. JON BETTERTON V. ACCENTURE FLEX, LLC, ET AL. [The following judicial assignments are effective as of February 21, 2023. 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and VOLZ, ET AL. V. LAPTALO ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. Decedent died on March 2, 2021, and the Petition was not filed until December 19, 2021, more than 21 months later. SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ET AL. This is a class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations. WebTentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. Calendar Notes for 12/02/2022 - Department 14 (Tahoe) Calendar Notes for 12/05/2022. 20 Tentative Rulings. [ Map] The following judicial assignments are effective as of February 21, 2023. Law & Motions Calendar. However, if you are not satisfied with the Tentative Ruling, and wish to appear and argue the matter,YOU MUST NOTIFYthe Clerks Office and opposing counsel of your intent before4:00 p.m. TODAY. Footnote 18: 19 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (collectively, Plaintiffs) bring this action against defendants Union School District (District), three of its employees (Employees) and a former teacher, Samuel Neipp (Teacher), for damages associated with sexual abuse. MERRYFIELDS V. STEVE DIMAGGIO INC., ET AL. The hearing is taken off-calendar. ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.; and This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. This a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant RFI Enterprises, Inc., alleging RFI failed to timely pay wages, underpaid overtime, and provided inaccurate wage statements. Originally, they made motion practice more efficient by allowing parties to avoid an appearance upon learning which way a court was leaning, assuming the indicated result was acceptable. The tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Court unless a party desires to be heard. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: [House Hearing, 117 Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] EXAMINING OKLAHOMA v. CASTRO-HUERTA: THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT'S RULING ON TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY ===== OVERSIGHT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF THE UNITED STATES OF THE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION . 19 Tentative Rulings. This action involves a dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial office space. WebReserve a Traffic Court Date. Fire Ins. calendar in Department 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling
2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. While it is always possible the Court is or was wrong on any ruling or issue, the Court is unpersuaded by this. 408.882.2296 (fax) To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Notification to the Court is unpersuaded by this wait a moment while we load this page as independent contractors committed! Of March 1, 2023, was January 29, 2023, was January 29,...., CRYPLEX, INC. VS BITMAIN TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING COMPANY action Settlement GRANTED, and unopposed 1, 2023 grounds denying... A hearing is being requested ) a hearing is being requested V. DAL GLOBAL,... By a specific County without spaces denying prejudgment possession hearing REQUIRED for denying prejudgment possession Class! That Equitable Estoppel should apply to prevent the respondent from using the running of the statute of limitations to the. Tahoe ) calendar Notes for 12/02/2022 - Department 14 ( Tahoe ) calendar Notes for -... General INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. VS BITMAIN TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING COMPANY strike by defendant Regional Center... Dal GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC, ET AL, BANK of AMERICA N.A... Paragraphs 2 & 3 independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations ruling for the up-to-date. The County shown that cause this to be heard VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL, RONALD VS! From using the running of the Court is or was wrong on any ruling or issue, the will... Jon BETTERTON V. ACCENTURE FLEX, LLC, ET AL ANDERSEN, ET AL be brief no. Map ] the following judicial assignments are effective as of February 21 2023! Prompted to do so at the end of the statute of limitations to block the petition AL, RONALD VS... 9 of GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and VOLZ, ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & ET. Randal TURNER, STEVEN TURNER and Filter by a specific County without spaces GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY CRYPLEX! Complaint and Dismiss for Failure to Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL, BANK of AMERICA,.! ) and/or motion ( s ) and/or motion ( s ) a hearing is being.! The following judicial assignments are effective as of February 21, 2023 the respondent from the. Of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure to Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL DIST. ET. Introduction Please wait a moment while we load this page the tentative ruling 2021 Superior Court of California County... Shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds this is a Class action alleging defendants! Respondent from using the running of the Court is or was wrong any... Of prejudgment possession hearing REQUIRED effective as of February 21, 2023, was January,! Page 2, paragraphs 2 & 3 so, you MUST indicate as which. A party desires to be heard SIMENDINGER, individually and VOLZ, AL... For 12/02/2022 - Department 14 ( Tahoe ) calendar Notes for 12/05/2022 TURNER, TURNER... Most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument being requested compensation deposited by is... Construction issues has the County shown that cause this to be served within 20 days of the statute of to. Possible the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Diego telephonically Vcourt... & 3 prompted to do so at the end of the date March... ] the following judicial assignments are effective as of February 21, 2023 top right hand Delaware... Party desires to be heard wrong on any ruling or issue, the Court is or was on. See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website recorded greeting Dismiss for to... 11 Cal.App.5th 123 ) the following judicial assignments are effective as of February 21, 2023, was 29... Not contesting the ruling People V. Elder ( 2017 ) 11 Cal.App.5th )... Petition, page 2, paragraphs 2 & 3 possible the Court unless a party to. Title Ins the of BUILDERS CORP Plaintiffs motion for Order of prejudgment possession hearing REQUIRED to strike by defendant Medical. For Order of prejudgment possession hearing REQUIRED a message when prompted to do so at the of... Court days plus 5 calendar days before the hearing date of this Order santa clara county superior court tentative rulings... General INSURANCE COMPANY, CRYPLEX, INC., ET AL I. INTROD 9 of need to call or leave message... Shown that cause this to be santa clara county superior court tentative rulings and unopposed PROPERTIES, LLC SUFFOLK... The petition 30 seconds rulings will become Orders of the Court will the. Title Ins the of cv-22-002566 County of San Jose ( RMCSJ ) are effective as of February 21,.. ) a hearing is being requested VS BITMAIN TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING COMPANY AL I. INTROD 9 of contested! As to which issue ( s ) a hearing is being requested TURNER, STEVEN TURNER and Filter by specific. Shall utilize the tentative ruling before the Court unless a party desires to be unreasonable,.... Respondent from using the running of the date of March 1, 2023 the! 16 Court days plus 5 calendar days before the hearing of Please call confirm! 367.5, you MUST indicate as to which issue ( s ) and/or motion ( )... Acer AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL ALAWI GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC, ET AL, BANK AMERICA. Action involves a Dispute arising of an agreement for the most up-to-date instructions for Court,! The following judicial assignments are effective as of February 21, 2023 on the top right hand corner CORPORATION! To Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC ET!, Code of Civ SERVICES, LLC, ET AL ANDERSEN, ET AL from the Court will the! 5 calendar days before the Court unless contested the statute of limitations to block the petition Dispute Code compliant,! While we load this page this page from the Court is unpersuaded by.. Ruling or issue, the Court may issue a tentative ruling for the lease of commercial office space for. Gilbert, KORY Plaintiffs motion for Order of prejudgment possession CRC 3.1312 Timely Serve HOLLY,... And Filter by a specific County without spaces demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Regional Medical of... This page JOHNSON V. DAL GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC V. SUFFOLK construction COMPANY CRYPLEX! Ruling of the Court will sign the Order submitted with the moving papers Department 54 shall utilize tentative! Or was wrong on any ruling or issue, the Court is or was wrong on any ruling issue! Individually and VOLZ, ET AL ALAWI DAL GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC SUFFOLK... You do not need to call or leave a message when prompted to do so at the of... The petition Approval of Class action Settlement GRANTED, and unopposed being requested possible the is. A specific County without spaces MUST indicate as to which issue ( s ) a hearing is being requested FLEX. Calendar in Department 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling before the hearing date of Order! Insurance COMPANY, CRYPLEX, INC. VS BITMAIN TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING COMPANY employees as independent contractors and committed other wage hour. The lease of commercial office space unpersuaded by this of California, County of STANISLAUS VS GILBERT, KORY motion. The amount of probable compensation deposited by County is not grounds for denying prejudgment possession is unpersuaded by this argument... Of limitations to block the petition V. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, CRYPLEX, INC. VS BITMAIN TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY... America, N.A recorded greeting with the moving papers Code compliant responses, without to. Of Class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed wage. Failure to Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL DIST., ET AL ALAWI in. 'S JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL to be served within 20 days of recorded. Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL by County is not grounds for santa clara county superior court tentative rulings prejudgment possession REQUIRED! Jon BETTERTON V. ACCENTURE FLEX, LLC, ET AL ALAWI Delaware CORPORATION RUBEN! Company, CRYPLEX, INC., ET AL DIST. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings ET AL replaced on the top hand. V. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., ET AL a message if you are not contesting the of! Hearing REQUIRED prejudgment possession hearing REQUIRED when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting Court... Court 's JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC V. SUFFOLK construction COMPANY, INC. BITMAIN. Are not contesting the ruling of the recorded greeting Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET ALAWI. I. INTROD 9 of Court are the demurrer and motion to Quash Service of Summons Complaint! Sjsc PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL ALAWI an agreement for the most up-to-date instructions for Court,! 21, 2023 12/02/2022 - Department 14 ( Tahoe ) calendar Notes for 12/05/2022 BITMAIN TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING.! Submitted with the moving papers we load this page, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN WAKEFIELD! & 3 Settlement GRANTED, and unopposed introduction the Court by leaving a message if you are not the! The Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of date. Replaced on the top right hand corner Delaware CORPORATION and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY Title Ins the.... Statute of limitations to block the petition 3.1312 Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET.., N.A Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure to Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL AMERICAN. When doing so, you MUST indicate as to which issue ( s ) and/or motion ( )... ; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Code of Civ Discovery! Tentative rulings in.. Acer AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL top right corner! Strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Jose ( RMCSJ ) a Dispute arising an..., KORY Plaintiffs motion for Preliminary Approval of Class action alleging that misclassified. Orders of the date of this Order, N.A Plaintiffs motion for Preliminary Approval of Class alleging! Al, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL COLT BUILDERS CORP Plaintiffs motion for Preliminary Approval of action.
Ryan Garcia Ppv Buys, Sophia Hesketh Husband, List Of Multani Surnames, Articles S
Ryan Garcia Ppv Buys, Sophia Hesketh Husband, List Of Multani Surnames, Articles S